🔁 1. Ôn tập – 10 phút
🔁 Ôn thẻ từ vựng đến hạn
🧠 Nhớ lại buổi trước (không xem tài liệu)
- Buổi 61: kể 3 collocation với restore / reintroduce / graze.
- T/F/NG: khác Y/N/NG ở điểm nào?
- Summary có hộp từ (buổi 17): ba lớp lọc là gì?
Trả lời to hoặc viết ra giấy, rồi mới mở lại buổi trước để kiểm tra.
📖 2. Đầu vào – 25 phút
Remembering what was lost
(Bài đọc tự viết; vùng biển, nhân vật và ví dụ là giả định.)
A Ask an experienced fisherman in the hypothetical coastal town of Port Elna how the sea has changed, and he may tell you that catches today are smaller than when he started work in the 1980s. Ask his grandfather’s generation, and they might describe fish so large and plentiful that the fisherman’s own “good old days” would seem poor by comparison. Each generation, in other words, tends to measure decline against the conditions it first knew, rather than against a longer history.
B This tendency is often described as the problem of “shifting baselines”. A baseline is the reference point against which change is measured. If each generation accepts the state of nature it encountered in its youth as normal, then gradual losses can go largely unnoticed. Over several generations, an ecosystem may become dramatically poorer while, at any single moment, people perceive only modest change. The idea was first discussed in relation to fisheries but has since been applied to forests, bird populations and many other areas.
C Shifting baselines matter for conservation because targets for restoration depend on them. If planners aim to return a river to the condition it was in thirty years ago, they may set a goal that already represents a heavily degraded system. Conversely, if they choose a baseline from several centuries ago, they may set a target that is impossible to achieve, given changes in climate, land use and human population that cannot be reversed.
D How, then, can people recover a sense of what has been lost? One approach is to use historical records that were never intended as scientific data. Old market records of fish sales, photographs of catches, ships’ logbooks and even restaurant menus can reveal the size and abundance of species in the past. Such sources must be interpreted carefully, since they were produced for other purposes, but taken together they can provide a surprisingly detailed picture.
E Another approach draws on the memories of older residents. In Port Elna, a local museum recorded interviews with retired fishermen about the species they used to catch and where they caught them. Some researchers have been cautious about this kind of anecdotal evidence, since memory is selective. However, when interviews are compared with each other and with written records, consistent patterns can emerge. In Port Elna, several interviewees independently described a type of flatfish that is now rarely seen in the bay, and their accounts matched entries in old market records.
F Not everyone agrees that historical baselines should guide policy. Critics argue that ecosystems are always changing and that there is no single “natural” state to which they should be returned. Some suggest that conservation should focus instead on what ecosystems can do now – providing clean water, preventing floods, supporting wildlife – rather than on recreating the past. Supporters of historical baselines reply that, without knowledge of the past, people cannot even recognise how much has been lost, let alone decide what is worth recovering.
G Perhaps the most important lesson of shifting baselines concerns perception rather than policy. Children who grow up with empty skies and quiet hedgerows may come to see these as normal. Simply making people aware that things were once different can change what they regard as acceptable – and that, in turn, may influence what they are willing to protect.
✅ Câu 1–7: Do the statements agree with the information in the passage? TRUE, FALSE hoặc NOT GIVEN
1. Each generation tends to compare current conditions with those it experienced when young.
2. The idea of shifting baselines was first developed in the study of forests.
3. Choosing a baseline from several centuries ago may produce an unrealistic target.
4. Restaurant menus are the most reliable historical source for fish sizes.
5. All researchers accept interviews with older residents as reliable evidence.
6. The Port Elna museum interviews were funded by the local government.
7. In Port Elna, accounts from different interviewees were consistent with written records.
✅ Câu 8–13: Complete the summary using the list of words A–J (đoạn F–G).
Critics claim that ecosystems are constantly (8) ____ and have no single natural state.
They believe conservation should focus on the current (9) ____ of ecosystems, such as preventing floods,
rather than trying to (10) ____ the past.
Supporters reply that without (11) ____ of the past, losses cannot be recognised.
Children who grow up with fewer birds may regard this as (12) ____.
Making people aware of past conditions may affect what they are willing to (13) ____.
🧩 3. Ngôn ngữ trọng tâm – 10 phút: collocation học thuật về thay đổi
| Collocation | Ví dụ |
|---|---|
| go largely unnoticed | Gradual losses can go largely unnoticed. |
| set a target / a goal | Planners set a goal that is already degraded. |
| a heavily degraded system | (không nói |
| interpret (sources) carefully | Such sources must be interpreted carefully. |
| consistent patterns emerge | When accounts are compared, patterns emerge. |
| let alone | …cannot recognise the loss, let alone decide what to recover. |
📖 4. Thực hành – 20 phút
- Chữa bài: với câu 2, 4, 5, 6 – viết câu trong bài làm căn cứ (hoặc ghi “không có”) (8 phút).
- Giải thích “shifting baselines” trong 3 câu tiếng Anh, dùng baseline, go unnoticed, let alone (6 phút).
- Sổ cụm từ band 7: by comparison, conversely, taken together, in turn (6 phút).
💼 Dùng ngay – phát hiện kiểm tra hiện trường so với mốc chuẩn (thêm 5–10 phút)
Phát hiện tốt luôn có mốc so sánh rõ (lần kiểm tra trước, tiêu chuẩn nội bộ, quy định) – nếu không, “tốt hơn” hay “kém đi” không có nghĩa.
📝 Site inspection findings (60–90 từ)
Write 3 findings from a site inspection. For each, state the baseline you are comparing against (previous inspection, internal standard), the current condition, and whether it has improved, stayed the same or declined.
👀 Xem bài mẫu tham khảo (sau khi đã viết xong)
Bài mẫu tham khảo do khóa học viết; địa điểm và chi tiết giả định.
Site inspection findings – Workshop 2, 27 November
1. Housekeeping: compared with the October inspection, aisles were clear and no materials were stored in walkways. Improved. 2. Machine guarding: two of eight lathes were operated with guards raised, against the internal standard of zero. No change since October. 3. Chemical storage: labels were missing from three containers, compared with none at the last inspection. Declined; to be corrected by 1 December.
📚 Từ vựng của buổi
- baseline – mốc chuẩn so sánh
Choose a clear baseline before measuring change.
- decline – sự suy giảm
The decline went largely unnoticed.
- abundance – sự dồi dào
Old records show the abundance of fish.
- historical records – tư liệu lịch sử
Historical records reveal past conditions.
- biodiversity – đa dạng sinh học
Biodiversity has fallen in the bay.
- perception – nhận thức
Shifting baselines affect perception.
- restoration target – mục tiêu phục hồi
The restoration target was too modest.
- ecosystem – hệ sinh thái
The ecosystem has become poorer.
- anecdotal evidence – bằng chứng giai thoại
Anecdotal evidence must be checked.
- benchmark – chuẩn đối chiếu
We use last year's audit as a benchmark.
✅ 5. Tự kiểm tra – 10 phút
✅ Tự kiểm tra
Nghe lại bản ghi của mình và tích những điểm bạn đã làm được. Ô tích chỉ lưu trên máy này.